Arya Samaj Forum Index Arya Samaj

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Home | Forum | Arcade

Personal Views on Marriage and Sexuality
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Arya Samaj Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
savitri
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 82


Location: Mumbai N Melbourne

PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:52 am    Post subject: Love transcends all barriers Reply with quote

Criterion for marriage should be undiluted pure & matured love and not age difference, caste, colour, nationality, religion, financial standing, social status et cetera. As a hypothetical case, suppose I marry an old man and he dies after some time then he is sure to watch over me on earth from his new abode in astral sphere. Thanks. Namastey.
_________________
Love is god & god is love.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ayush
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 03 Nov 2006
Posts: 128


Location: Pune, India

PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Love transcends all barriers Reply with quote

savitri wrote:
Criterion for marriage should be undiluted pure & matured love and not age difference, caste, colour, nationality, religion, financial standing, social status et cetera. As a hypothetical case, suppose I marry an old man and he dies after some time then he is sure to watch over me on earth from his new abode in astral sphere. Thanks. Namastey.

What do you mean by "abode in astral sphere"? Please elaborate.

How do you know he won't immediately get re-incarnated according to his net Karma?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
savitri
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 82


Location: Mumbai N Melbourne

PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:41 am    Post subject: Re: Love transcends all barriers Reply with quote

Ayush wrote:

What do you mean by "abode in astral sphere"? Please elaborate.
How do you know he won't immediately get re-incarnated according to his net Karma?

Abode means place or home where he will live in astral sphere.
In case he immediately re-incarnates after his death, subtle laws of Nature will make him gravitate towards me and an invisible power will make him marry me. When I become 45 years old he may be 20 years old but he will become father of my children and we will rejoice in Immortality of Love.
_________________
Love is god & god is love.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ayushji,

I am not willing to move ahead with this discussions until u edit your origional post. Your comments did not respect women in any way and u fail to see it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ayush
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 03 Nov 2006
Posts: 128


Location: Pune, India

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^
I'm not editing anything. The mods/admins can edit whatever they think is inappropriate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Shishya
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 1985


Location: Europe

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste,

As far as I can tell, all Ayush was saying is that women shouldn't complain about being stared at if they walk around dressed indecently. I don't see where the sexism towards women is in that comment. But I invite the ladies to point it out to me... Smile
_________________
Namaste,

Shishya

ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mitra
Bharat News Forum Moderator
Bharat News Forum Moderator


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 298


Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste Shishya Ji,
This would be repeating myself, but my point is that the sexist part comes in because we know women are stared at even when dressed most modestly. Its mostly just an excuse from guys we hear all the time that when a girl is all dressed up its to attract attention. Such thinking is even at the root of the sexist inhumane treatment received by the widows in our culture traditionally where a woman is not allowed to dress up / adorn herself for her own expression of personality and aesthetics because her master has died so there is no purpose for beauty in her life anymore.Women dont exist for men to look at them, Women dress up for themselves too... (Its only the males in all of the natural world except us modern humans who preen themselves and make a show of their mating colors and prowess ,come to think of it...)
Well my point is unless a healthy respect for women and allowing them their space is cultivated in society its highly difficult for women to come out and just go about their life. And the way Ayush ranted, it certainly didn't reflect a respectful attitude to women. Even burqas will not stop an indecent thought or stare. So do we women best stay at home behind purdahs lest our presence disturb the thoughts of aspiring celibates like Ayush?

Edit: I dont think Ayush needs to edit his words though. Lets bring all the attitude out into the open, atleast he expresses his views honestly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shishya
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 1985


Location: Europe

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste Mitra Ji,

You wrote:
This would be repeating myself, but my point is that the sexist part comes in because we know women are stared at even when dressed most modestly.

I agree - some men stare regardless. But you shouldn't draw the conclusion that because a man calls for modesty in dress that he is automatically sexist and oppresive towards women.

You wrote:
Its mostly just an excuse from guys we hear all the time that when a girl is all dressed up its to attract attention.

There is a difference between a woman 'dressing up' to enhance her natural beauty and a woman over-exposing herself to attract attention from men - which certainly happens. I can't speak for Ayush, but as for me, that's all I'm referring to when I say that women who expose themselves should not be surprised if some men stare at them. Granted, the men that stare might not be of the best moral fiber, but regardless, as the saying goes, "it takes two to tango".

If a woman is dressed in a normal fashion, and a man stares, then he has a problem - I'm not arguing with that at all. But for a woman, wearing a super-short miniskirt and a top that barely covers her top, to walk into a room and then criticize a man who has turned to look at her for 'leering' is a bit too much, in my opinion. And I think it would be stretching the truth to say that she is simply 'going about her life'. She could do that same thing in normal attire as well. That's far away from forcing her into a burqa.
_________________
Namaste,

Shishya

ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mitra
Bharat News Forum Moderator
Bharat News Forum Moderator


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 298


Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I said in my previous posts I am not supporting indecency. I am arguing against the rant of Ayush where he doesn't own up to the responsibilty of his own thoughts .

And what about the way women were illtreated as widows in our culture. They were made to shave their heads so that their subhuman appearance would help uphold the morality of the society . What lead to such oppression of basic dignity? What about the ideas that women are gateways to hell because they lead a man towards the mire of samsaara . Ayush's initial rant was very similar to this idea saying he hated that women disturb his free existence sans the commitment...if you look at his initial posts .

[quote]just go about their life[/qoute] I meant the average women going abt their lives in the workplaces,schools and on the roads and the fields whose life is a everyday struggle .
"Who we are, where we go, what we wear, how we sit, stand, talk, walk in our very own cities. When we demand the need to make our cities non threatening I don’t expect anyone to think of me as their sister or mother, but to really look at women as citizens who have every right to be out on the streets, without any explanation. Sometimes we just love to walk, stand around, hang around, without looking ‘avaliable.’" http://www.blanknoiseproject.blogspot.com/
Girls and women have been killed on the streets of India .
"Far too often, we find the victim on the wrong side of the stick. If we were to go into the aetiology of eve-teasing, as propounded by so-called analysts of the phenomenon, it would seem ludicrous, if not nauseating — "With the way she dressed she had it coming," "She would have encouraged the boys" and "Boys will be boys, girls have to be discreet". The "behavioural scientists" are in a sense in cahoots with eve-teasers as they seem to be condoning their crimes. How would they explain the fact that hell-raisers on the road knock the living daylights out of a motorist for no other reason than the fact that she is a woman. And we know only too well that many of these victims are clad in saris or churidhars, and not in skin-hugging, skimpy outfits."

http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mp/2002/09/10/stories/2002091000070100.htm
Thats the reason why I am obsessively posting to this thread. Only if one knows how bad the situation in India is today for the average women - one can understand that basic rights of women to breathe and live are at risk because of attitudes of people who are rankled by even the mere physical presence of women amidst them.
We speak of women as Maatrushakti around here. We can choose to learn to see that power in the women or just go along being led by senses as Ayush says its what the eyes see that matters more than what his brain thinks.
_________________
Namaste
Manurbhava
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mitra
Bharat News Forum Moderator
Bharat News Forum Moderator


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 298


Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Women in India are organizing campaigns where they stare back at men - retaliation to a desperate situation.






Last edited by Mitra on Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shishya
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 1985


Location: Europe

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste Mitra Ji,

Well, judging by your last comments, this has little to nothing to do with clothing, then. It has to do with the attitude and behavior towards women in general.

Like I said, if a woman is dressed normally, and a man stares at or taunts her, then in my opinion he has some kind of problem that needs to be addressed.

You wrote:
And what about the way women were illtreated as widows in our culture. They were made to shave their heads so that their subhuman appearance would help uphold the morality of the society . What lead to such oppression of basic dignity? What about the ideas that women are gateways to hell because they lead a man towards the mire of samsaara? Ayush's initial rant was very similar to this idea saying he hated that women disturb his free existence sans the commitment...if you look at his initial posts .

I was looking at Ayush's original post:

Ayush wrote:
If you go back to the 1920s and since then consider how the fashion trends have changed and people's clothes have changed, you'll find that as far as males' clothes are concerned, only the fabric has changed. But if you want to talk about females' clothes, the fabric has changed but apart from that, the clothes keep getting shorter and tighter with each passing decade.

And then girls want to act like they don't like it when boys look at them. We cannot see something you're not showing! Its not like we have x-rays vision or something. If you're going to wear tight low rise jeans and other similar things, you're going to get started at! Get over it.

That way I read it, he was talking about clothes that expose a woman unnecessarily - and the women that wear such clothes. I don't think he was trying to say that all women who are stared at deserve it.

I am ready to admit that there have been a lot of superstitious and malformed practices regarding women over the past centuries. And I think modern culture does very little to teach men to control their passions and instead lays the responsibility upon women. Even in America 60 years ago it was not uncommon to excuse teen rapists on the grounds that the girl 'had it coming to her' for dressing provocatively. For the record, I am not supporting such barbarism in the least. I am for the promotion of Brahmacharya for all - though I see little chances of that returning as a virtue any time in the near future.
_________________
Namaste,

Shishya

ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A woman should wear anything that makes her feel comfortable and beautiful. We do have a reputition to keep up. As long as we dress appropriately for every occassion...i don't see a problem.

She can be naked, but that still didn't give men the right to look at her.They are many nudest in North America.....We just respect them for who they are.

Those saadhus in India wear no clothing. We see them as Saadhus and nothing else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ayush wrote:
If you go back to the 1920s and since then consider how the fashion trends have changed and people's clothes have changed, you'll find that as far as males' clothes are concerned, only the fabric has changed. But if you want to talk about females' clothes, the fabric has changed but apart from that, the clothes keep getting shorter and tighter with each passing decade.

And then girls want to act like they don't like it when boys look at them. We cannot see something you're not showing! Its not like we have x-rays vision or something. If you're going to wear tight low rise jeans and other similar things, you're going to get started at! Get over it.


My interpretition

(1) Women back in the 1920's wore more clothes than women today.
(2) Compare the way men and women dressed from 1920's to now......men still wear the same style and size but different fabrics and women don't.
(3) Women clothes get shorter and tighter each passing decade.

As women we know fashion. The climate has changed dramitically.....there is a need to dress appropriate for the weather.

That still do not give guys the right to stare at them and make comments. Ofcourse girls hate to be stared at...stare back at them is no better revenge.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ayush wrote:
I get to rant too.

[rant]
In my opinion, Oprah Winfrey is another crazy feminist who likes to talk nonsense.
"The entire world is against females"
HALF THE WORLD IS FEMALES!



Well tell me what this suppose to mean other than what was stated. Confused


Last edited by Sunita on Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Prabhat
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 1171


Location: Holland, The Hague

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste,

i like this topic.

but i think is not the clothes, but the girl/women in the clothes that men look at. for example. i would look at a girl who is to big/or to skinny in a bikini/skirt or whatever.

So i think is the face of a beautifull women(ofcourse tast of the men) who makes men Aashiqs, and yes if they have nice clothes, well thats more beautifull.

thats why, old (hindoe)Suriname women where ornies, to hide there faces from other men. i think they where ahead in this things. But oke we live in a modern time we go with the times of clothes.



living here in holland i see also girls/womens who look at men. as of they have a kind of status, so he is loaded with money. So here in holland is not that strange people looking at each other.

thats my opinion.



ahhh girls before you attack me. i have a mother, 4 sisters, wife and 2 daughters and so i am surrounded by female. Wink Wink Wink
_________________
Namaste,
Prabhat
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Shishya
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 1985


Location: Europe

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste Sunita Ji,

You wrote:
A woman should wear anything that makes her feel comfortable and beautiful. We do have a reputition to keep up. As long as we dress appropriately for every occassion...i don't see a problem.

Disregarding the notion of 'keeping up a reputation' (due to the fact that 'reputation' is the key term under question here), I agree completely. Everyone has the right to wear what they want within the boundaries of socially acceptable and appropriate clothing.

You wrote:
She can be naked, but that still didn't give men the right to look at her.They are many nudest in North America.....We just respect them for who they are.

Well, I have to differ with you here. We are not isolationists and we do not live in a bubble. We are members of a society and as such we have a duty to respect the wishes of others. If you walk down the street as naked as the day you were born armed with nothing more than what you feel is the right to slap every man's face that looks at you, then you're going to be doing a lot of slapping. There's a reason that nudists have 'nudist colonies'. Namely, because they realize that such behavior is only appropriate among those who agree with it. I respect their right to congregate among themselves. But I don't want a naked man serving me chai at the local tea house, if you know what I mean.

We live in an open society. That gives people the right to look at others. And if you do something out of the ordinary, then you have to expect to receive more attention than others. That's human nature. No, I don't agree with men leering at women. But if you want to make yourself look 'attractive' or 'beautiful' - and you're successful - isn't it strange for you to be upset if others actually find you 'attractive' or 'beautiful'? Wasn't that your intent in the first place?

You wrote:
Those saadhus in India wear no clothing. We see them as Saadhus and nothing else.

Good point, Sunita. But is that what women really want? I find that hard to believe. Women want to appear attractive, intelligent and loveable - which, when you get right down to it, means looking 'fertile'. And this affects men also: Men want to look strong, self-secure, wealthy, etc. In other words, capable of supporting a family. Sadhus don't do anything for their appearance that doesn't have some spiritual significance for them. They're not trying to impress anyone other than God.

As you've said yourself, a woman wants to dress in a way that makes her feel comfortable and beautiful. Yet, for whom does she want to be beautiful? For others? Then she has to deal with the consequences of her actions. For herself? This, in my opinion, is altogether worse. A person, regardless of gender, should have enough self-respect to accept themselves how they are. No amount of makeup or fancy clothes can change who we are. It would be nothing more than some kind of show.

As for the change in clothing: It's not so much the weather that has changed. It's the moral climate that has changed.

You wrote:
Ayush wrote:
"The entire world is against females"
HALF THE WORLD IS FEMALES!

Well, tell me what this suppose to mean other than what was stated.

Exactly what it says, i.e. that for someone to say that 'The whole world is against women' would be illogical on the grounds that 50% of the global population is itself composed of women. This would amount to saying women are oppressing themselves. Which, in turn, becomes self-contradictory for a self-proclaimed feminist.

If you stop and think about it for a minute, I think you'll see that this comment is not really sexist at all. In fact, you could go a step further and see it as pointing out the self-defeating sexism latent within the radical feminism of today. For by saying that 'the whole world is against women', when in fact, at most only half (the male half) could be against them, feminists are discrediting the 50% female population and relegating them to a position of meaninglessness. Hence, modern feminism is often more debilitating for women than empowering. It just depends on how you want to look at it...
_________________
Namaste,

Shishya

ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ayush
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 03 Nov 2006
Posts: 128


Location: Pune, India

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sunita wrote:
Ayush wrote:
I get to rant too.

[rant]
In my opinion, Oprah Winfrey is another crazy feminist who likes to talk nonsense.
"The entire world is against females"
HALF THE WORLD IS FEMALES!



Well tell me what this suppose to mean other than what was stated. Confused

Nope. I meant exactly what I said. 85% of the feminists are crazy people who need to get a hobby.

The females are themselves responsible for their state. I know so many girls who would just like to be a "housewife".
And don't forget that most of the times women suffer because of their mother in laws.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Ayush
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 03 Nov 2006
Posts: 128


Location: Pune, India

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sunita wrote:
She can be naked, but that still didn't give men the right to look at her.They are many nudest in North America.....We just respect them for who they are.

I don't know what you mean by "we" but I too have a lot of friends and relatives in North America and Europe. The nudists get stared at a lot. And they don't even care. They know its a choice they've made for themselves and that they haven't been forced to roam around naked. Just the way females in most free countries are not forced to roam around in clothes that make the shape of their breasts and buttocks so very apparent.

EDIT : Actually, not all females are Oprah Winfrey groupies. I know females who have admitted that they dress the way they do because they want boys to look at them. Not just one or two females but just about every female I know.

Also, "looking" and "leching" are very different things. What I've been talking about in all my posts is "looking".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Shyena
Gold Member
Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 964


Location: Hyderabad, AP

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste,
Just one thing, its not always guys who are against rights of gals. There are many a times I see when I fight for the rights of women, such as reading vedas, their liberty of dress/work, etc.... And women are the foremost members who argue against me - to the extent they say I'm a feminist....
It is also to be understood very well, the people who first wail when a baby girl is born, is not men but women.
_________________

meditate Krinvanto Vishwam Aryam meditate
namaste Namaste namaste
AUM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
savitri
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 82


Location: Mumbai N Melbourne

PostPosted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:15 am    Post subject: One is responsible for oneself Reply with quote

It is the lurking conscious, sub-conscious or unconscious desire in some corner or recess of mind or heart that makes a female victim of male chauvinism. In other words, a female is to blame herself if there is any atrocity on her.
Pardon me for burdening the forum with my person. Once a rich boy offered me ten thousand rupees for touching my body for two seconds but I refused. Thanks. Namastey.
_________________
Love is god & god is love.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ayush wrote:
Sunita wrote:
She can be naked, but that still didn't give men the right to look at her.They are many nudest in North America.....We just respect them for who they are.

I don't know what you mean by "we" but I too have a lot of friends and relatives in North America and Europe. The nudists get stared at a lot. And they don't even care. They know its a choice they've made for themselves and that they haven't been forced to roam around naked. Just the way females in most free countries are not forced to roam around in clothes that make the shape of their breasts and buttocks so very apparent.

EDIT : Actually, not all females are Oprah Winfrey groupies. I know females who have admitted that they dress the way they do because they want boys to look at them. Not just one or two females but just about every female I know.

Also, "looking" and "leching" are very different things. What I've been talking about in all my posts is "looking".


Thanks for clearing the Oprah Winfrey groupies. Well, some females loves the attention from males. God created women with certain taste in fashion. So we like to dress up but there is a limit. Next time u look at a tight fitted woman just picture her as a machoman and not a babe. Very Happy

Forget about the cup size and the other shapes.....just think of oranges, apples and other healthy fruits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:53 am    Post subject: Re: One is responsible for oneself Reply with quote

savitri wrote:
It is the lurking conscious, sub-conscious or unconscious desire in some corner or recess of mind or heart that makes a female victim of male chauvinism. In other words, a female is to blame herself if there is any atrocity on her.
Pardon me for burdening the forum with my person. Once a rich boy offered me ten thousand rupees for touching my body for two seconds but I refused. Thanks. Namastey.


Savitri,

i am not sure if i understood what u meant. I haven't slept all night yet...pardon me. Females suppose to blame themselves if there is any atrocity on her??? Its not always the female fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ayush wrote:
Sunita wrote:
Ayush wrote:
I get to rant too.

[rant]
In my opinion, Oprah Winfrey is another crazy feminist who likes to talk nonsense.
"The entire world is against females"
HALF THE WORLD IS FEMALES!



Well tell me what this suppose to mean other than what was stated. Confused

Nope. I meant exactly what I said. 85% of the feminists are crazy people who need to get a hobby.

The females are themselves responsible for their state. I know so many girls who would just like to be a "housewife".
And don't forget that most of the times women suffer because of their mother in laws.


How old are you? Why do you think 85% of women are crazy and need a hobby? Where i live women can do anything a man can do. What sort of experience do u have with women to come to such conclusions??? Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shishya
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 1985


Location: Europe

PostPosted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Namaste Sunita,

Ayush said 85% of feminists, not women. Unless, of course, all women are feminists in your eyes...
_________________
Namaste,

Shishya

ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Sunita
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator
Arya Ladies Forum Moderator


Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 567



PostPosted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shishya wrote:

If you walk down the street as naked as the day you were born armed with nothing more than what you feel is the right to slap every man's face that looks at you, then you're going to be doing a lot of slapping.

True bro

shishya wrote:
But I don't want a naked man serving me chai at the local tea house, if you know what I mean.

just naked men?? Laughing

"[quote="shishya"]We live in an open society. That gives people the right to look at others. And if you do something out of the ordinary, then you have to expect to receive more attention than others. That's human nature. No, I don't agree with men leering at women. But if you want to make yourself look 'attractive' or 'beautiful' - and you're successful - isn't it strange for you to be upset if others actually find you 'attractive' or 'beautiful'? Wasn't that your intent in the first place?

Very Happy Won't deny this ...don't understand why woman gets upset. They should just ignore it or look right back at them.

"
shishya wrote:
As you've said yourself, a woman wants to dress in a way that makes her feel comfortable and beautiful. Yet, for whom does she want to be beautiful? For others? Then she has to deal with the consequences of her actions. For herself? This, in my opinion, is altogether worse. A person, regardless of gender, should have enough self-respect to accept themselves how they are. No amount of makeup or fancy clothes can change who we are. It would be nothing more than some kind of show.


In 2003, i wore a skirt suit and fishnet nylons while driving through Quebec, Montreal and New York. Because i am from IGLOO....i find it warmer in those cities....the attention i got on the streets in Montreal was shocking. I was walking with my ex and my son and teenagers from school in every block and men thought i was a hooker. He made me take it off before entering New York. I thought it was pretty but different cultures just a whole different story. I never wore that in the public ever. Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Arya Samaj Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Custom Theme by Shishya

744438